[G.R. No. 170710. March 27, 2006]
TRIPLEX ENTERPRISES, INC. v. ESTATE OF THE LATE ALEX DIZON, JUANICIO DIZON AND JUDILYN DE LA CRUZ-DIZON
First Division
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of the First Division of this Court dated MAR. 27, 2006
G.R. No. 170710 (Triplex
Enterprises, Inc. v. Estate of the late Alex Dizon, Juanicio Dizon and Judilyn De la Cruz-Dizon)
Before acting on the petition for review on certiorari, petitioner is DIRECTED
to comment on the Consolidated Opposition and Motion and Supplemental
Consolidated Opposition and Motion filed by Juanicio Dizon stating among others that:
1. he is the father of the late Alex Dizon
and his inclusion as one of the respondents is totally misplaced and
unwarranted because he is not the proper party-in-interest in this case for he
was not an occupant or possessor of the disputed property and that his son was
emancipated from him by attaining the age of majority and marriage. Neither is he the executor or administrator
of the estate of the deceased nor a party to the transaction, if any, with the
petitioner affecting the property expropriated by the government. Neither was he duly and properly sued or
summoned before the lower courts and before the Court of Appeals to warrant his
inclusion in the petition.
2. the Court cannot acquire jurisdiction over him in this case
just because the petitioner included him in the caption and his special
appearance now, through counsel, should not be construed as voluntary
appearance but is precisely being done to question the jurisdiction of the
Court over him and the apparent desperation of the petitioner at this late
stage to include him as party respondent in this case despite lack of legal
basis to do so.
3. neither is the inclusion of Judilyn Dela Cruz as party
respondent at this late stage valid and justified because she has long been
separated from the late Alex Dizon long before this
case was filed before the court a quo.
Judilyn Dela Cruz has never lived or occupied the expropriated
realty and the same was not a conjugal estate of the former spouses. Judilyn Dela Cruz has re-married and has lived in
within ten (10) days from receipt hereof.
SO ORDERED.
Very truly yours,
(Sgd.) ENRIQUETA
ESGUERRA-VIDAL
Clerk of Court
First Division