THE SUPREME COURT has cleared the Light Rail Transit
Authority (LRTA) of any liability but held the Metro
Transit Organization, Inc. (Metro) liable for the
illegal dismissal of employees whose strike in 2000
paralyzed LRT System operations.
In a decision penned by Senior Associate Justice
Reynato S. Puno, the Court’s Second Division
granted the LRTA’s petition to dismiss the complaint
for illegal dismissal filed against it by respondents
Perfecto H. Venus, Jr., et al. At the same
time, however, the Court affirmed the assailed Court
of Appeals’ decision insofar as it holds Metro
liable for the illegal dismissal of private respondents
and orders it to pay their benefits and full back
wages, as well as moral damages. Further, the Court
ordered Metro to pay attorney’s fees equivalent
to ten percent of the total money judgment.
The Court said that the workers were indeed illegally
dismissed by Metro. It noted that they could not have
defied the return-to-work order of the Secretary of
Labor simply because they were dismissed immediately,
even before they could obey the said order. On the
other hand, the Court held that LRTA has no employer-employee
relationship with the private respondents since they
were hired by Metro alone. (LRTA v. Venus, Jr.,
et al., GR No. 163782,; Metro Transit Organization,
Inc. v. CA, et al., GR No. 163881, March 24,
2006)
|